因此,人们约定了一种货币报酬,使他们能够获得满足其需要所必需的财产和劳动。这种货币报酬,就商品而言是价格,就劳动而言是工资。这是因为,在商品交换中,它是对商品本身的回报;在劳动交换中,它是对人所付出的努力所带来的利益的回报。因此,贸易交易和雇佣合同对人而言是不可或缺的,尽管贸易与雇佣之间除了都是人与人之间的交易之外,并无其他联系。所以,雇佣不取决于买卖(贸易),工资也不取决于价格。因此,工资的估定不同于价格的估定,二者之间并无关联。这是因为,价格是对财产的回报,所以它必然是以一种财产换取另一种财产,无论该财产是以价值还是以价格来估定的。工资是对努力的回报,而努力未必会产生财产;它可能产生财产,也可能不产生。努力所带来的利益并不局限于财产的生产,因为劳动还会带来财产之外的利益。因此,农业、商业和工业中所付出的努力,无论其种类和数量如何,都能产生财产,并直接增加国家的财富。但医生、工程师、律师、教师以及其他类似的服务,并不产生财产,也不直接增加国家的财富。如果一个制造者获取工资,他是以其所生产的财产作为交换而获取的;但如果一个工程师获取工资,他并不是以财产作为交换而获取的,因为他并未生产任何财产。因此,价格的估定必然是以财产作为回报的。 这与由劳动所产生的利益的估值相悖。劳动所产生的并非财产的回报,而是利益的回报,而利益未必是财产。由此,买卖不同于雇佣员工,价格在实际估值上也不同于工资。然而,买卖与雇佣之间的差别、价格与工资之间的差别,并不意味着二者之间没有关联。它们的差异在于:雇佣不应建立在买卖之上,买卖也不应建立在雇佣之上。因此,价格的估定不以工资的估定为基础,工资的估定也不以价格的估定为基础。这是因为,若以其中一方为另一方的基础,就会导致工人所生产商品的价格去左右他所获得的工资;而事实上应当是商品价格制约雇主,而不是制约雇员。若让价格来制约雇员,则会导致雇主控制雇员,使其可以借口物价的涨跌而随意增减工资,这是不允许的。因为雇员的工资是对其劳动利益的报酬,所以他的工资应当等同于其劳动利益的价值,而不应与其所生产商品的价格挂钩。那种认为在商品价格下跌时强制雇主支付估定工资会导致其亏损,进而导致工人被裁减的说法,是不成立的。这只会发生在整个市场的商品价格都下跌的情况下。因此,此事应交由专家估定,以保障工人的利益,而不应交由雇主决定。这是因为,专家考虑的是劳动的整体利益,而不是仅仅考虑某一个个别情况。 因此,工资的估算并不以商品的价格为准,而是由专家的估算来决定。
Accordingly, people agreed upon a monetary reward that enables them to obtain the properties and the labour necessary for the fulfilment of their needs. This monetary reward, concerning commodities is the price, and concerning labour is the wage. This is because, in the exchange of commodities, it is a recompense for the commodity itself, and in the exchange of labour it is a recompense for the benefit of the effort spent by man. Thus, trade transactions and hiring deals are indispensable for man, though there is no connection between trading and hiring except that they are transactions between individuals amongst human beings. So hiring does not depend on selling (trading), nor does the wage depend on the price. Therefore the estimation of the wage is different from the estimation of the price, and there is no relationship between them. This is because the price is a recompense for property, so it is inevitably a property in return for a property, whether the property was estimated with the value or the price. The wage is the recompense for an effort, which does not necessarily produce a property; rather it may or may not produce a property. The benefit from effort is not restricted to the production of property, as there are benefits other than property which result from labour. Accordingly, the efforts spent in farming, trading and industry, whatever their kind, and whatever their amount, produce property and this directly increases the wealth of the country. But the services, provided by the doctor, the engineer, the solicitor, the teacher, and other similar services, do not produce property nor directly increase the wealth of the nation. If a manufacturer took a wage He would have taken it in exchange for a property He produced, but if an engineer took a wage, He would have not taken it in exchange for a property, because He did not produce any property. Therefore the estimation of the price is inevitably in return for a property. This is contrary to the estimation of the benefit resulting from effort, which is not a return of property but rather a return of benefit, which may or may not be a property. In this way, selling is different from hiring an employee, and the price differs from the wage regarding the actual estimation However, the difference of selling from hiring, and of price from wage, does not mean the absence of a relationship between them. Rather their difference means that hiring is not to be built upon selling or selling upon hiring. So the estimation of the price is not based upon the estimation of the wage, nor is the estimation of the wage based upon the estimation of the price. This is because establishing one of them upon the other leads to the prices of commodities which the worker produces, controlling the wages He receives, whereas the prices of the commodities control the employer, not the employee. If the prices were left to control the employee then this would lead to the employer controlling the employee, thus He may reduce and increase the wage whenever He likes, under the pretence of the decline and increase of the prices, a matter that is not allowed. This is because the wage of the employee is in return for the benefit of his work, so his wage equals the value of his benefit, and it should not be linked to the prices of the commodities He produces. It is untrue to claim that forcing the employer to pay the estimated wage, when the price of the commodity falls, leads to his loss, and accordingly leads to making the worker redundant. This only occurs when the prices of the commodity fall down in the whole market. Therefore, this matter is left to the estimation of the experts for the benefit of the worker and not left to the employer. This is because the experts consider the whole benefit of the labour in general, and do not consider one case only. Therefore, the estimation of the wage is not based on the price of the commodity, but decided by the estimation of the experts.