It's been over seven months, with 45,000+ civilians killed in P41estine the majority of whom are women and children. Similarly with Muslims worldwide (Burma, Kashmir, Uygurs in East Turkestan etc..), and the silence of "Muslim" rulers is deafening. The only solution is for Muslims to mobilize their armies and unite under a single umbrella of Khilafah, which is the promise of Allah SWT. If you are in a position of power, please raise your voice. If you can't do much, please consider donating to Palestine Red Crescent Society or any other charity organisations which you truly trust, JazakAllah khairan.

Constitution (191)

The courts should be comprised of only one judge who has the authority to pronounce judgement. One or more judges are permitted to accompany him, however they do not have the authority of judgement but rather the authority of consulting and giving their opinion, and their opinion is not considered binding.

Its proof is that the Messenger (pbuh) did not appoint two judges to one case, but rather he would appoint a single judge for the single case, which indicates the impermissibility of having a multiplicity of judges in a single case. Additionally, the judiciary is the informing of the Shari’ah rule which is then binding, and the Shari’ah rule for the single Muslim is not multiple, since it is the rule of Allah (swt), and the rule of Allah (swt) is one. It is correct that there could be multiple understandings of it, but concerning the Muslim from the angle of action according to it, the Shari’ah rule is singular and is never multiple. So anything other than what he understood to be the rule of Allah (swt) concerning oneself is not the rule of Allah (swt) for him, though it is considered in his view to be a Shari’ah rule. Whatever he took by imitation (Taqlid), and then acted upon, is considered to be the rule of Allah (swt) concerning him, and anything else is not the rule of Allah (swt) for him. When the judge informs him of the rule of Allah (swt) concerning him, and this is binding upon him, it is necessary that this notification be singular since it is informing him of the rule of Allah (swt) which is binding for him, and so in reality he is acting according to the rule of Allah (swt), and the rule of Allah (swt) in the situation of practical action is not multiple, even though there may be multiple understandings. Accordingly it is not correct for there to be multiple judges, since it is impossible for the rule of Allah (swt) to be multiple.

This is with respect to the single case, or in other words, in a single courtroom. As for the country, it is permitted to have two separate courts dealing in all types of cases in one area, because the judiciary is delegated by the Khalifah, so it is like the proxy where plurality is permitted and thus it would be permitted to have several judges in one area. If the disputing parties could not agree on which court they should take their case to or which judge should look into their case, the choice of the plaintiff would outweigh that of the defendant and the case would be given to the judge of his choice, as he would be seeking his right and this outweighs the defendant.

The Qadi, the Muhtasib and the Madhalim judge may be given a general appointment to pronounce judgement on all problems throughout the State, or alternatively they can be given an appointment to a particular location and to give judgement on particular types of cases.

The evidence is the actions of the Messenger (pbuh) , since he appointed ‘Ali b. Abi Talib (ra) as a judge for Yemen as reported by Ahmad with an authentic chain from Ali (ra) who said

 إيلَى الْيَمَ ي ن، قَالَ: فَ قُلْتُ: يَا رَسُولَ اللَّيه، تَ بْ عَثُيني إيلَى قَ وْمٍ  )ب عََثَيني رَسُولُ اللَّيه اللَّهُمَّ ثَ بِّتْ « : أَسَنَّ يمنِّي وَأَنَا حَ ي ديثٌ لاَ أُبْ ي صرُ الْقَضَاءَ، قَالَ: فَ وَضَعَ يَدَهُ عَلَى صَدْيري وَقَالَ لِسَانَهُ وَاهْدِ قَ لْبَهُ، يَا عَلِيُّ، إِذَا جَلَسَ إِلَيْكَ الْخَصْمَانِ فَلاَ تَ قْضِ بَ يْ نَ هُمَا حَتَّى تَسْمَعَ مِنْ قَالَ: فَمَا ،» الآخَرِ كَمَا سَمِعْتَ مِنَ الأَوَّلِ، فَإِنَّكَ إِذَا فَ عَلْتَ ذَلِكَ تَ بَ يَّنَ لَكَ الْقَضَاء اخْتَ لَفَ عَلَيَّ قَضَاءٌ ب عَْدُ، أَوْ مَا أَشْكَلَ عَلَيَّ قَضَاءٌ ب عَْدُ (

“The Messenger of Allah (pbuh) sent me to Yemen, and I said: You have sent me to people of experience, and I am young! And I don’t know how to judge. He struck me on the chest and said:'O Allah, guide his heart and make his tongue steadfast. He said: When the two litigants sit in front of you, do not decide till you hear what the other has to say. If you do that, judgement will become clear to you. Ali said: after that I never doubted in passing judgment between two people.”.

He appointed Mu’adh as a judge over a part of Yemen, Abu Umar b. ‘Abd Al-Barr mentioned in Al-Isti’ab

بَ يْنَ مُعَاذِ بْنِ جَبَلٍ وَبَ يْنَ جَعْفَرِ بْنِ  )وقال ابن إسحق: آخَى رَسُولُ اللهِ قَاضِياً إِلَى الْجَنَدِ  أَبِي طَالِبٍ، شَهِدَ العَقَبَةَ وَبَدْراً وَالْمَشَاهِدَ كُلَّهَا، وَبَ عَثَهُ رَسُولُ اللهِ مِنَ اليَمَنِ، ي عَُلِّمُ النَّاسَ القُرْآنَ وَشَ رائِعَ الإِسْلاَمِ، وَيَ قْضِي بَ يْ نَ هُمْ. وَجَعَلَ إِلَيْهِ قَ بْضَ الصَّدَقَاتِ مِنَ الْعُمَّالِ ...(

“Ibn Ishaq said: The Messenger of Allah (pbuh) made a brotherhood between Mu’adh Bin Jabal and Ja’far b. Abi Talib; they witnessed Al-Aqaba and Badr and all of the events, and the Messenger of Allah (pbuh) sent him to Al-Janad in Yemen to teach the people Quran and the Shari’ah of Islam, and to judge between them, and to collect the Sadaqah from the workers…”

He (pbuh) appointed Amr b. Al-‘As to give judgement in one particular case. Ibn Qudamah mentioned in Al-mughni saying

 فَ قَالَ:  )وَعَنْ عُقْبَةَ بْ ي ن عَايمرٍ قَالَ: جَاءَ خَصْمَا ي ن يََْ تَ ي صمَا ي ن إيلَى رَسُويل اللهي قُ لْتُ: عَلاَمَ أَقْ ي ضي؟ قَالَ: .» وَإينْ كَانَ « : قُ لْتُ: أَنْتَ أَوْلَى بيذَليكَ. قَالَ » اقْضِ بَ يْ نَ هُمَا « )» اقْضِ فَإِنْ أَصَبْتَ فَ لَكَ عَشَرَةُ أُجُورٍ، وإِنْ أَخْطَأْتَ فَ لَكَ أَجْرٌ وَاحِدٌ «

“From ‘Uqbah b. Amir who said: Two litigants brought their dispute to the Messenger of Allah (pbuh), and so he said – Judge between them. I said: You have supremacy over me to do that. He said: Even if. I said: On what should I judge? He said: Judge, and if you are right, you will have ten rewards and if you make a mistake, you will get one reward”. Ibn Qudamah said, and Ahmad reported the same narration with a chain whose men were all authentic to ‘Uqbah b. Amir from the Prophet (phuh) , except that he said

 فَإِنِ اجْتَ هَدْتَ فَأَصَبْتَ الْقَضَاءَ فَ لَكَ عَشَرَةُ أُجُورٍ، وَإِنِ اجْتَ هَدْتَ فَأَخْطَأْتَ « » فَ لَكَ أَجْرٌ وَاحِدٌ

“And if you do Ijtihad and you are right, you will have ten rewards, and if you do Ijtihad and you have erred, you will get one reward”.

Whoever undertakes the responsibility of judgement must be a Muslim, free, adult, sane, just, a Faqih (person who knows jurisprudence/Fiqh), and aware of how to apply the rules to the events. And the person who undertakes the judiciary of injustices (Madhalim) in addition to the conditions mentioned, must also be male and a Mujtahid (capable of deriving his own Fiqh/conducting Ijtihad).

Its evidence is what was mentioned previously for the evidence for the Supreme judge, except that it is not a condition in the judge who settles the disputes and the judge of Hisbah to be male, rather it is permitted for the judge to be a woman, since it is not a position of ruling but rather a judge, in other words, they convey the Shari’ah rule while they are not the one who implements it. Accordingly, the narration

 » لَنْ ي فُْلِحَ قَ وْمٌ وَلَّوْا أَمْرَهُمُ امْرَأَة «

“Never will succeed such a nation that makes a woman their ruler.” reported by Al-Bukhari, does not apply, since it is regarding governorship which is ruling. And the reason for the narration was when the people of Persia were ruled by a woman; it is narrated from Abu Bakrah who said “When the Messenger of Allah (pbuh) was notified that the people of Persia were ruled by the daughter of Kisra, he said:

» لَنْ ي فُْلِحَ قَ وْمٌ وَلَّوْا أَمْرَهُمُ امْرَأَة «

‘Never will succeed such a nation that makes a woman their ruler’” (reported by Al-Bukhari). So the reason for the words of the narration was a specific subject which was mentioned explicitly in the text of the narration, which is ruling, in other words, authority, and the judiciary is not an authority. Accordingly the narration is specific to ruling and does not encompass the judiciary, and that is for two reasons:

Firstly, the text which is related in a specific subject is like the text which is an answer to a question, and so it is necessary to make it specific to the issue of the question or event, and it is not correct for it to be general in all issues, because the question is reflected in the answer, and because the words are in a specific subject it is necessary to limit them to that subject, since the word of the Messenger (pbuh) is connected to the question or event, and so the rule is connected to that. This is different than if the Messenger (pbuh) had said that initially (not in response to an event) in which case it would be general and connected to the generality. As for if his word is a comment upon a specific event, or an answer to a specific question, then the situation is different. If the text, in other words, the words of Allah (swt) or the words of the Messenger (pbuh) , were definitely connected to a question or event, then the rule is connected to that without any doubt. This is with respect to the subject that either came from a question or event. And it is not with respect to the questioner or whom the event occurred upon, since the consideration in both of them is given to the generality of the words and not to the specific cause. And this is why there is a difference made between the cause and the subject, so the consideration is to the generality of the words and not to the specific cause, since the words are not connected to the cause, and so they remain upon their generality. This is different to the event or question, in other words, different to the subject which was included by the event, or the subject which was included by the question, since the words are definitely connected to it, and there is no doubt in that, since the narration was only for its sake, or due to it, and due to this it is specific to the subject, and not general. Accordingly the narration

 » لَنْ ي فُْلِحَ قَ وْمٌ وَلَّوْا أَمْرَهُمُ امْرَأَة «

“Never will succeed such a nation that makes a woman their ruler” is specific to ruling, and does not encompass the judiciary.

This is the first reason. As for the second reason, the words “makes a woman their ruler” are from governorship, and this is the governorship of the command, and the judge is not a governor, and is not a governor for the command. Accordingly the judge does not come under this narration, so the narration does not encompass the judiciary.

This is from the angle of the indication of the narration and as for the angle of the permission for a judge to be a woman, the judge is an employee like the rest of the civil servants. And it is permitted for an employee to be male or female;


“And if they breastfeed for you, then give them their payment.” (TMQ 65:6). The judge is appointed to undertake an action according to the Shari’ah, or in other words, to inform the two disputing parties of the Shari’ah rule which would be binding upon them, and he is not appointed in order to implement the Shari’ah. Due to this the definition of the employee would apply to him, since it is a contract upon a service for compensation, which is opposite to the ruler since the definition would not apply to him, since he is not contracted over a specific service, rather he is given the command to execute the Shari’ah, and for this reason it is not permitted for a ruler to be a woman because he is a governor of a command (Wali Al-Amr). It is permitted for the judge to be a woman, since the judge is an employee and not a ruler.

With regards to the rest of the conditions for the judge, their proofs were discussed in the section about the conditions of the Khalifah. Similarly the evidence for the condition that they be a faqih (to know jurisprudence) is the narration

 "القضاة ثلاثة"

“The judges are of three kinds” until he said

 » وَرَجُلٌ قَضَى لِلنَّاسِ عَلَى جَهْلٍ فَ هُوَ فِي النَّارِ «

“and a man who passess judgement on the people in ignorance will be in hellfire” (reported in the Sunan and authenticated by Al-Hakim from Buraydah).

This is for the judiciary of Hisbah and the judiciary that resolves the disputes between the people, where it is permitted for the judge to be a woman. As for the judge of the Court of Injustices (Madhalim), it is a condition that he is male, like the Supreme Judge, because his work is both ruling and judging, since he rules upon the ruler, and implements the Shari’ah upon him, and for that reason it is a condition that he is male along with the rest of the conditions of the judge, of which being a Faqih is one. However, in addition to that, it is a condition that he should be a Mujtahid, because as part of the injustices (Madhalim) he may be required to look into whether the ruler has ruled by other than that which Allah (swt) has revealed, or in other words, has ruled by a law that has no Shari'ah evidence, or to look into whether the evidence he used does not apply to the event. This type of injustice (Madhlamah) can only be dealt with by a Mujtahid, since if he were not a Mujtahid, he would be judging on something he knows little about or has no knowledge about at all, and that is forbidden and not permitted. Therefore, in addition to the conditions of the ruler and those of the judge, he should also be a Mujtahid.

The Judges are of three types: One is the Judge (Qadi), and he undertakes settling the disputes between people over transactions and penal codes. The second is the Muhtasib, who undertakes the settling of any breach of law that may harm the rights of the community. The third is the judge of the Court of Injustices (Madhalim), who undertakes the settling of disputes between the people and the State.

This article explains the types of judiciary. The evidence about the judge that settles disputes between people is derived from the actions of the Messenger of Allah (pbuh) , and from his appointment of Mu’adh b. Jabal (ra) over an area of Yemen.

As for the evidence for the judiciary regarding the settling of disputes which endanger the rights of the community, where the judge is known as the Muhtasib, this is confirmed by the action and words of the Messenger of Allah (pbuh) , for he said

» لَيْسَ مِنَّا مَنْ غَشَّ «

“He who decives has nothing to do with us” (reported by Ahmad and Ibn Maja from Abu Hurayrah). He used to confront the cheaters and punish them. Qays b. Abi Gharzah Al-Kanani reported

 كنا نبتاع الأوساق في المدينة ونسمي أنفسنا السماسرة، فخرج علينا رسول الله يَا مَعْشَرَ التُّجَّارِ، إِنَّ الْبَ يْعَ يَحْضُرُهُ اللَّغْوُ « : فسمانا باسم أحسن من اسمنا قال  » وَالْحَلْفُ، فَشُوبُوهُ بِالصَّدَقَةِ

“We used to trade in the markest of Al-Madinah and we used to call ourselves as-Samasirah (brokers), so the Messenger of Allah (pbuh) came out to us and gave us a better name. He said: O company of merchants, unprofitable speech and swearing takes place in business dealings, so mix it with Sadaqah (alms)” (reported by the authors of the Sunan and Al- Hakim who authenticated it, and Al-Tirmidhi said it is Hasan Sahih). And it is narrated that Al-Bara’ b. ‘Azib and Zayd b. Arqam were partners, so they both bought some silver with money on the spot and by credit. This news reached the Messenger of Allah (pbuh) , so he ordered

» أَنَّ مَا كَانَ بِنَ قْدٍ فَأَجِيزُوهُ، وَمَا كَانَ بِنَسِيئَةٍ فَ رُدُّوه «

“What was by (on the spot) money is permitted, and what was on credit must be rejected” (reported by Ahmad from Al-Minhal). All of this is the judiciary of Hisbah.

Calling the judiciary that settles the disputes that may harm the right of the community as Hisbah is in fact a technical term referring to a specific task carried out in the Islamic State, which is the monitoring of the traders and skilled workers in order to prevent them from cheating in their trade, work, or products, forcing them to use measurements and scales and preventing anything else that may harm the community. These are the very types of actions that the Messenger of Allah (pbuh) demonstrated, ordered to be observed, and undertook in settling their issues, as is clear from the narration Al-Bara’ b. ‘Azib, where he prevented both parties from selling silver by credit. Therefore, the evidence about the Hisbah is from the Sunnah. In the same manner, these evidences include that the Messenger of Allah (pbuh) appointed Sa‘id b. Al-‘As over the Makkan market after it had been conquered as is mentioned in Al-Tabaqat of Ibn Sa’d, and in Al-Isti’ab of Ibn Abdul Birr. And Umar Bin Al-Khattab (ra) appointed Al-Shifa, a woman from his clan, as a market judge (inspector), in other words, a judge of Hisbah, as he also appointed ‘Abd Allah b. Utbah over the market of Madinah, as reported by Malik in Al- Muwatta and Al-Shafi’i in his Musnad. He personally used to also deal with the judiciary of the Hisbah, and would go around the markets just like the Messenger (pbuh) used to do. The Khulafaa’ went on carrying out the Hisbah until when Al-Mahdi came he established a special department for the Hisbah, making it a part of the institutions of the judiciary. At the time of Al-Rashid, the Muhtasib (judge of Hisbah) would go around the markets, checking the weights and measures for any cheating, and to look into the traders’ transactions.

The proof for the judiciary that is called the Judge of the Court of Injustices (Madhalim) is the action of the Messenger (pbuh) having allowed him to retaliate from the Messenger (pbuh) himself. Al-Bayhaqi narrated in Alsunan Alkubra through Abi Saeed Alkhudari who said:

فطعنه رسول الله  يقسم شيئا أقبل رجل فأكبَّ عليه  بينما رسول الله فقال له الرسول ،  بعُرجون "أي ي عذْق من نخل" كان معه  فجرح الرجلَ  فقال بل عفوت يا رسول الله. ،» تعالَ فاستَقِدْ «

“While the Messenger of Allah (pbuh) was dividing something, a man approached him and tried to hastily take a portion from the Prophet (phuh) . He stabbed him with a date tree stalk which was with him, thereby wounding the man. The Messenger (pbuh) said to the man: “Come and retaliate.” The man replied: I have forgiven O Messenger of Allah.”. This is a case between the head of the state (the Messenger of Allah (pbuh) ) and one of the citizens, and additionally he said

 فَمَنْ كُنتُ أصبتُ مِن عِرضه، أو مِن شَعره، أو من بَشَرِه، أو مِن ماله شيئاً، « » هذا عِرض محمد وشعرُه، وبشرُه، ومالُه فليَ قُمْ فليَقتصَّ

“Whoever I took property from, here is my property; let him take from it, and whosever back I whipped, here is my back; take recompense from it.” reported by Abu Ya’la from Al-Fadl Bin ‘Abbas. Al-Haythami said that ‘Ata b. Muslim who is in the chain of Abu Ya’la has been considered trustworthy by Ibn Hibban and others, whereas others have weakened him, and the rest of the narrators are trustworthy. In a narration by Tabarani in al-Mu’jam Al-awst by al-Fadhl bin al-Abbas narrated that the Prophet (phuh) said,

فمَنْ كنتُ جلدتُ لهُ ظهراً فهذا ظهري فليَسْتَقِدْ منه، ومَنْ كنتُ شتمتُ لهُ « » عِرضاً فهذا عِرضي فليَسْتَقِدْ منه، ومن كنتُ أخذتُ لهُ مالاً، فهذا مالي فلْيَسْتَقِدْ منه

“Whoever I had whipped his back here is my back, let him retaliate! Whoever I had cursed his honor, here is my honor let him curse it! Whoever I had taken some money from him here is my money, let him take from it.” This is nothing other than the judiciary of the injustices (Madhalim), because it is encompassed by the definition of the judiciary of injustices (Madhalim), which is the investigation into what occurred between the people and the Khalifah. Therefore, the evidence for the judiciary of injustices (Madhalim) is the actions and words of the Messenger (pbuh) . However, he did not make a judge specific to the injustices (Madhalim) alone for all the areas of the State, and the Khulafaa’ after him proceeded in the same manner, in that they used to deal with the injustices (Madhalim) as occurred with ‘Ali Bin Abi Talib (ra) – but he did not make it during a specific time or with a particular style, rather the injustice (Madhlamah) would be looked into as it occurred, and so it was part of the overall actions. The situation remained the same until the days of ‘Abd Al-Malik b. Marwan, who was the first Khalifah to deal with the injustices (Madhalim) separately at a specific time with a particular style, so he used to designate a specific day, and would look into the injustices, and subsequently if anything was difficult for him he would pass it to his judge who would rule upon it. After that, built upon this system, the Khalifah would appoint a delegate who would look into the injustices raised by the people, and the Court of Injustices (Madhalim) became a specific apparatus, and used to be called “Dar Al-‘Adl” (the House of Justice). This is permitted from the angle of appointing a judge who is specific for it, since it is permitted for the Khalifah to appoint someone as a delegate to undertake his work in all the mandatory powers that he has and it is permitted from the angle of specifying a particular time, and style, since it is from the permitted issues.

The Khalifah appoints a supreme judge to the judiciary from the male, adult, free, Muslim, sane, just people who know jurisprudence, and if he was given the power to appoint and remove the Madhalim judge, and had the power of judgement in the Madhalim, then he would have to be a Mujtahid. He would have the power to appoint judges, discipline them, and remove them as part of the administrative systems. As for the remainder of the civil servants of the courts, they are connected to the Department Manager who is responsible for the courts’ affairs.

The origin is that the Khalifah can appoint governors to a specific governorship upon one of the issues in all the parts of the State, just as he can appoint a governor to a specific governorship upon one of the issues in a specific location, similar to how he can appoint a governor to a general governorship in a specific location. So, just as the Khalifah can empower a leader for Jihad, and one for Hajj, and one over the land taxes, he can also empower a leader for the judiciary. He can give that leader the right to appoint judges, remove them and discipline them, in the same way that he can give the leader of Jihad the right to appoint Majors and Corporals over the soldiers, and discipline them and remove them. Due to this it is permitted for the Khalifah to appoint a Supreme Judge, or in other words, a leader over the judiciary. This Supreme Judge, or leader of the judiciary, would be a ruler and not a civil servant, since he is a governor who has undertaken a governorship - in other words, ruling - just like any leader or governor over any of the issues. However, he is not considered to be an assistant for the Khalifah in the judiciary because he was given a specific appointment, in other words, in all the issues of judiciary, and so his appointment is in the judiciary and does not go beyond that. As for the assistant, he is given a general appointment in all the issues, so the Khalifah can seek his help in all issues, unlike the Supreme Judge who can assist in the judiciary alone.

It is not confirmed that the Messenger (pbuh) appointed a Supreme Judge, in the same way that it is not confirmed that any of the righteous guided Khulafaa’ appointed a Supreme Judge. There is nothing that indicates that the judiciary in the territories used to have deputies who would carry out the judiciary in the towns and villages, neither in the time of the righteous guided Khulafaa’, and not even by the time of the Ummayads. The first appointment of a supreme judge by the Khalifah was at the time of Harun Al-Rashid, and the first judge to be given this description was the judge Abu Yusuf, the famous Mujtahid, who was a companion of Abu Hanifah. Accordingly, it is permitted for the Khalifah to appoint a judge who is given the power to appoint and remove judges; so it is from the permitted actions.

Based upon this it is permitted for the Khalifah to appoint a “Supreme Judge”. However, his pre-conditions are the same of those of the judge and the ruler, since he is a judge and a ruler since he has been given the power to appoint judges and to adjudicate in court cases. In other words, it is a condition for the Supreme Judge to be male, adult, free, Muslim, sane, just, and from the people who know the jurisprudence, since the condition of capability in this case means that he should know jurisprudence since his work is responsibility over the judiciary in addition to his powers of judging. The Messenger (pbuh) has blamed whoever judges with ignorance and informed us that they would be from the people of the hellfire; he said

» وَرَجُلٌ قَضَى لِلنَّاسِ عَلَى جَهْلٍ فَ هُوَ فِي النَّارِ «

“And a man who passess judgement on the people in ignorance will be in hellfire” (reported by the authors of the Sunan and Al-Hakim who authenticated it from Buraydah). From this evidence it is has been made a condition that the judge should be from the people who know the jurisprudence. The Supreme Judge should be a Mujtahid if he was given the power to appoint and remove the Madhalim judge, and the powers to judge in the Madhalim, since such a judgement requires Ijtihad as is explained in article 78.

As for what is mentioned in the article about the appointment of civil servants for the courts, these people are employees and the evidence for the permission of their appointment is the evidence for the hiring of an employee.

The Judiciary is the pronouncement of the rule that becomes binding. It settles the disputes between the people and prevents that which harms the community’s rights, or it eliminates the disputes arising between people and members of the ruling system – both rulers and civil servants – from the Head of State downwards.

The origin of the judiciary and its legitimacy is the Book and the Sunnah. As for the Book, the words of Allah (swt)

“And judge, [O Muhammad], between them by what Allah has revealed.” (TMQ 5:45), and His (swt) words

“And when they are called to [the words of] Allah and His Messenger to judge between them.” (TMQ 24:48).

As for the Sunnah, the Messenger (pbuh) used to undertake the judiciary by himself and judge between the people, such as what Bukhari narrated from 'Aisha (ra), the wife of the Prophet (phuh) , that she said

)كَانَ عُتْبَةُ بْنُ أَيبي وَقَّاصٍ عَيهدَ إيلَى أَ ي خييه سَعْ ي د بْ ي ن أَيبي وَقَّاصٍ أَنَّ ابْنَ وَلييدَةي زَمْعَةَ يمنِّي فَاقْبيضْهُ، قَالَتْ: فَ لَمَّا كَانَ عَامُ الْفَتْ ي ح أَخَذَهُ سَعْدُ بْنُ أَيبي وَقَّاصٍ وَقَالَ: ابْنُ أَ ي خي قَدْ عَيهدَ إيلَََّ فيييه ، فَ قَامَ عَبْدُ بْنُ زَمْعَةَ فَ قَالَ: أَ ي خي وَابْنُ وَلييدَةي أَيبي وُليدَ عَلَى فيرَا ي شيه، فَ تَسَاوَقَا إيلَى فَ قَالَ سَعْدٌ: يَا رَسُولَ اللَّيه، ابْنُ أَ ي خي كَانَ قَدْ عَيهدَ إيلَََّ فيييه، فَ قَالَ عَبْدُ بْنُ زَمْعَةَ:  النَّيبِِّ ،» هُوَ لَكَ يَا عَبْدُ بْنَ زَمْعَة « : أَ ي خ ي وَابْنُ وَ لييدَةي أَيبي وُليدَ عَلَى فيرَا ي شيه ، فَ قَالَ رَسُولُ اللَّيهالْوَلَدُ لِلْفِرَاشِ وَلِلْعَاهِرِ الْحَجَرُ « : ثُمَّ قَالَ النَّيبُِّ

“`Utba bin Abu Waqqas took a firm promise from his brother Sa`d bin Abu Waqqas to take the son of the slave-girl of Zam`a into his custody as he was his (i.e. `Utba's) son. In the year of the Conquest (of Mecca) Sa`d bin Abu Waqqas took him, and said that he was his brother's son, and his brother took a promise from him to that effect. 'Abu bin Zam`a got up and said, "He is my brother and the son of the slave-girl of my father and was born on my father's bed." Then they both went to the Prophet (phuh) Sa`d said, "O Allah's Prophet (phuh) ! He is the son of my brother and he has taken a promise from me that I will take him." 'Abu bin Zam`a said, "(He is) my brother and the son of my father's slave-girl and was born on my father's bed." Allah's Prophet (phuh) said, "The boy is for you. O 'Abu bin Zam`a." Then the Prophet (phuh) said, "The son is for the bed (i.e. the man on whose bed he was born) and stones for the one who has done illegal sexual intercourse”. And the Messenger of Allah (pbuh) used to appoint judges; he appointed ‘Ali (ra) as the judge over Yemen and he gave him instructions about how to judge by saying:

 إِذَا تَ قَاضَى إِلَيْكَ رَجُلاَنِ، فَلاَ تَ قْضِ لِلأَوَّلِ حَتَّى تَسْمَعَ كَلامَ الآخَرِ، فَسَوْفَ « » تَدْرِي كَيْفَ تَ قْضِي

“Do not judge for the first until you have heard the statement of the other. Soon you will know how to judge.” reported by Al-Tirmidhi, and Ahmad, and in the report of Ahmad with the wording

 إِذَا جَلَسَ إِلَيْكَ الْخَصْمَانِ، فَلا تَكَلَّمْ حَتَّى تَسْمَعَ مِنْ الآخَرِ كَمَا سَمِعْتَ « » مِنَ الأَوَّلِ

“When two litigants sit in fron of you, do not decide (and speak) until you listen from the second what you have heard from the first.”

The method of adjudication carried out by the Messenger (pbuh) can be deduced from the narration of 'Aisha (ra) that Sa’ad and ‘Abd Bin Zuma’ah disputed over the son of Zuma’ah, so each one of them claimed that he was his. The Messenger of Allah (pbuh) informed them of the Shari’ah rule that the son of Sawda bint Zuma’ah was the brother of ‘Abd Bin Zuma’ah, and that the child belongs to the one on whose bed it is born. Therefore, his judgement was information about the Shari’ah rule which he then enforced upon them, and so Abd Bin Zuma’ah took the child. This is the proof for Article 75, which gives the definition of the judiciary, and this definition serves as a description of the reality. However, since it is a Shari’ah reality, and since the Shari’ah definition is in fact a Shari’ah rule, it ,therefore, requires evidence from which it is to be deduced, and this narration serves as an evidence for the definition of the judiciary found in this article.

Some people defined the judiciary as being the “settling of disputes between people”, and this definition is deficient from one angle, and from another angle it is not a description of the reality of the judiciary as reflected in the Messenger of Allah (pbuh)’s actions and sayings. Rather, this definition is merely an explanation of what may or may not occur from the judiciary. The judge may rule upon the case and not settle the dispute between the parties. Therefore, the comprehensive and exclusive definition would be the one mentioned in this article and it has been deduced from the narrations.

Also, this definition includes the judgement between people, and this is mentioned in the narration of 'Aisha (ra). It also includes the Hisbah (public order) which is: “Conveying the Shari’ah rule for the purpose of enforcing it regarding that which causes harm to the rights of the community”. This is what has been narrated in the narration of the heap of food. It is narrated in Sahih Muslim on the authority of Abu Huraira that

 مَرَّ عَلَى صُبْ رَةِ طَعَامٍ فَأَدْخَلَ يَدَهُ فِيهَا فَ نَالَتْ أَصَابِعُهُ  أَنَّ رَسُولَ اللَّهِ « بَ لَلاً، فَ قَالَ: مَا هَذَا يَا صَاحِبَ الطَّعَامِ ؟ قَالَ: أَصَابَ تْهُ السَّمَاءُ يَا رَسُولَ اللَّهِ، قَالَ: أَفَلاَ » جَعَلْتَهُ فَ وْقَ الطَّعَامِ كيْ يَ رَاهُ النَّاسُ، مَنْ غَشَّ فَ لَيْسَ مِنِّي

“The Messenger of Allah (pbuh) happened to pass by a heap of eatables. He thrust his hand in that (heap) and his fingers were moistened. He said to the owner: What is this? He replied: Messenger of Allah, these have been drenched by rainfall. He remarked: Why did you not place this (the drenched part of the heap) over other eatables so that people could see it? He who deceives is not of me (is not my follower).” and in the report in Ahmad and Ibn Maja and Al-Darimi

» مَنْ غَشَّ نَا فَ لَيْسَ مِنِّا «

“He who deceives us is not from us”.

It also includes the Madhalim (injustices), because they are part of the judiciary and not part of the ruling, since they are complaints against the ruler. The Madhalim is defined as “Conveying the Shari’ah rule for the purpose of enforcing it regarding the disputes which occur between the people and the Khalifah, his governors or civil servants, and regarding what occurs between the Muslims due to differences in the meaning a text from the Shari’ah texts used in order to judge by them and to rule according to them.” The Madhalim were mentioned in the narration of the Messenger of Allah (pbuh) regarding the fixing of prices where he said:

وَإِنِّي لأَرْجُو أَنْ أَلْقَى اللَّهَ وَلا يَطْلُبُنِي أَحَ دٌ بِمَظْلِمَةٍ ظَلَمْ تُ هَا إِي اَّهُ فِي دَمٍ وَلا « » مَالٍ

“And I am hopeful that I will meet Allah and none of you are seeking (recompense from) me for an injustice (I have inflicted) involving blood or wealth.” reported by Ahmad from Anas Bin Malik, and in his words

 مَنْ أَخَذْتُ لَهُ مَالاً فَ هَذَا مَالِي فَ لْيَأْخُذْ مِنْهُ، وَمَنْ جَ لَ دْتُ لَهُ ظَهْراً فَ هَذَا « » ظَهْرِي فَ لْيَ قْتَصَّ مِنْه

“Whoever I took property from, here is my property; let him take from it, and whosever back I whipped, here is my back to take recompense from.” reported by Abu Ya’la from Al-Fadl Bin ‘Abbas. Al-Haythami said that ‘Ata’ b. Muslim, who is in the chain of Abu Ya’la, has been considered trustworthy by Ibn Hibban and others, whereas others have weakened him, and the rest of the narrators are trustworthy. This indicates that the issue of the ruler, governor or civil servant is raised to the judge of the Court of Injustices (Madhalim) in any claim of an injustice, and the judge of the Court of Injustices (Madhalim) conveys the Shari’ah rule which would be binding.

Based upon this, the definition would encompass the three types of judiciary reflected in the narrations and actions of the Messenger of Allah (pbuh) . These are the settling of disputes between people, preventing whatever may harm the rights of the community and the settling of the disputes between the subjects and the rulers, or between the subjects and the civil servants in their work.

The Department of Industry is in charge of all the affairs connected to industry, whether heavy industry such as the manufacturing of engines, machines, vehicles, materials and electrical equipment, or light industry. Similarly, whether the factories are of the public property type or they are included in the private property and have a relationship to the military industry. All types of factories must be established upon the basis of military policy.

The department of industry is the department that takes charge of all the affairs related to industry, whether they pertain to heavy industry like the manufacturing of motors, engines, vehicles, materials, and electrical equipment, or light industry; and irrespective of whether the factories were public or private property which have a relationship with the military industries. The factories in all sectors must be based on the war policy. This is because Jihad and fighting require an army, and in order to fight this army requires weapons. In order that these weapons be of the highest level and fully available, it is necessary to have an industry within the State, particularly the military industry, due to its strong relationship with Jihad.

In order that the State becomes independent of other countries and does not become influenced by any of them it should manufacture and develop its own weapons by itself. This makes it independent and in continuous possession of the most advanced and strongest weaponry, regardless of the level of development and advancement of weapons. It would also have at its disposal all that it needs of weapons to intimidate both the evident and potential enemies, as Allah (swt) says:

“And prepare against them whatever you are able of power and of steeds of war by which you may terrify the enemy of Allah and your enemy and others besides them whom you do not know [but] whom Allah.” (TMQ 8:60)

As such the State would have its own will, produce the weapons that it needs and develop them continuously so that it owns the strongest and most developed weapons in order to intimidate all the evident and potential enemies. Therefore, it is a duty upon the State to manufacture weapons by itself and it is not allowed to depend upon other states, because this allows other states to control it, its will, its weapons and its fighting.

It is quite clear in the world today that the states which sell weapons to other states do not usually sell every weapon, particularly the most developed weapons. They do not even sell weapons except with certain conditions that cover their utilisation. They will not sell them except in quantities that they, rather than the purchasing countries, decide. This gives the state which sells arms, authority and influence over the state which buys the arms, enabling it to enforce its own will upon the purchasing state, particularly if it was involved in a war. In that case it would need more arms, spare parts and ammunition, which would increase its dependence on the state which exports its arms and increase its submission to another state’s demands. This allows the state which exports arms to control it and its will, especially in times of war and in times of great need for arms and spare parts. Hence such a state would make itself, its will and its entity hostage to the state that exports arms to it.

Therefore, for all these reasons, the State has to independently manufacture its own arms and everything it requires for its war machine and spare parts. This can’t be achieved unless the State possesses heavy industry and started to build factories which produce heavy industry, both military and non-military alike. Thus it is necessary that the State have factories for producing all types of atomic weapons, rockets, satellites, airplanes, tanks, mortars, naval ships, armoured vehicles and all types of heavy and light weapons. It is necessary that it have factories which produce machines, motors, materials, and electronics, and factories which have a relation with public property and light factories which have relation with the military or war industries. All this is required by the duty of preparation which is obliged upon the Muslims by the saying of Allah (swt):

“And prepare against them whatever you are able of power.” (TMQ 8:60).

Since the Islamic State conveys the message of Islam by Da’wah and Jihad, it should be a state which should be continually ready to carry out Jihad. This requires the existence of heavy and light industry built upon the basis of its war policy. Thus in case it wanted at any time to transform these factories for military purposes, it would easily do so at any time. Therefore, all the industry in the Khilafah State should be based on the war policy, and all the factories, which produce the light and heavy industries, should be based on this policy, so that it becomes easy to transform their production to military production at any time the State requires.

The Department of Foreign Affairs is in charge of all the affairs connected to the relations of the Khilafah state with the foreign states, whether from the political angle, or economic, industrial, agricultural and trade aspects, or postal, cable and wireless connections and so on.

The Foreign Affairs Department undertakes the responsibility of all foreign affairs, pertaining to the relation of the Khilafah State with foreign states, whatever these affairs and relations may be, whether they are related to the political aspect and what it entails in the forming of pacts, peace treaties, ceasefires, negotiations, appointing ambassadors, sending Messengers and delegates, and establishing embassies and consulates, or relations that are related to matters that are economic, agricultural or are to do with trade, as well as postal communications or wire and wireless communications and so on. All of these matters are run by the Foreign Affairs Department, because they are concerned with the relations of the Khilafah State with other States.

The Messenger (pbuh) used to establish foreign relations with other states and entities, as was explained in the section regarding the executive assistant. He (pbuh) sent ‘Uthman b. ‘Affan (ra) to negotiate with Quraysh just as he (pbuh) negotiated with the delegates of Quraysh. He (pbuh) sent delegates to the kings and he (pbuh) received the delegates of kings and Amirs and concluded pacts and peace treaties. Similarly, his (pbuh) Khulafaa’ used to establish political relations with other states and entities. They would appoint people to carry these actions out on their behalf, on the basis that whatever action a person can perform by himself, he can delegate it to some other person to carry it out on his behalf.

Due to the complications of international life, and the vastness and variety of international political relations, we adopt that the Khalifah should delegate an institution within the state specific to the international relations where the Khalifah follows its work as he does with any other ruling and administrative institutions in the state, whether directly or through the executive assistant, in accordance with the related Shari’ah rules.

The most prominent issues that threaten the internal security that are under the responsibility of the Department of Internal Security to treat are: apostasy, rebellion and banditry, attacks on people’s wealth, attacking people and their honour and co-operating with the people of suspicion who spy for the belligerent disbelievers.

The function of the Department of Internal Security is to protect the internal security of the State and the actions which could lead to a threat to internal security are many including:

Apostasy from Islam, rebellion against the State manifested in destructive activities and actions of sabotage such as strikes or the occupation of vital centres of the State, and aggression against private, public, or State property. It might also be through rebellion against the State by use of arms.

Other actions which undermine internal security include banditry, in other words, highway robbery, and attacking people to rob their wealth and killing them.

Similarly, the attack on the property of people by theft, looting, robbery, misappropriation, as well as attacks on people through assault, injuring, and killing, in addition to attacks on their honour through lying, slandering and rape.

One of the other tasks of the Internal Security Department is to deal with suspicious people and protecting the Ummah and the State from their danger and harm.

These are the most important actions that could threaten the internal security. The Department of Internal Security protects the State and the people from all these actions. Therefore, whoever is declared an apostate, and is sentenced to death if he did not repent, then this department executes the death sentence. If those who declare apostasy are a group, then they have to communicate with them and ask them to return to Islam, and the State should not punish them if they repent, return to Islam and abide by the Shari’ah rules. If however, they insist on apostasy, then they are fought against. If they are small in number and the police force alone is able to fight against them, then they must proceed to do so, but if they are large in number and the police force is unable to overpower them, then they have to request the Khalifah to provide them with additional military force to help them. If this military force is not sufficient, then they must ask the Khalifah to order the Army to provide them with assistance.

This is concerning apostates. However, in regards to people who rebel against the State, if they do not use arms and limit themselves to destruction and sabotage by strikes, demonstrations, occupation of vital centres of the State, along with aggression against private, public and State properties through demolition, then the Internal Security Department restricts itself to using the police force in order to prevent such destructive actions. If it is not able to prevent the aggression, it requests the Khalifah to provide it with a military force in order to stop the destruction and sabotage from those who rebelled against the State.

However if the people who rebel against the State use weapons and were able to establish themselves in an area and became a force that the Department of Internal Security is unable to subdue, and it was unable to eliminate through the use of the police force alone, then it requests the Khalifah to provide it with a military force or an army force, depending on its need in eliminating the rebellion. Before it fights against them, the department should communicate with them to see what complaints they may have. It should ask them to return to obedience and the Jama’ah and to surrender their arms. If they respond favourably and return back, then the State should hold back from fighting them. If they reject and insist on rebelling, then it fights against them in order to discipline them and not to annihilate and destroy them. It fights against them, so that they turn back to obedience and give up rebellion and surrender their arms.

In regards to those that use violence, such as the highway robbers, who attack people, forcibly obstruct the highways, steal property and kill, the Department of Internal Security will dispatch a police force to pursue them and impose the relevant punishment upon them, which may be killing and crucifying, amputating their opposite limbs or deporting them to another place, according to the verse:

“Indeed, the penalty for those who wage war against Allah and His Messenger and strive upon earth [to cause] corruption is none but that they be killed or crucified or that their hands and feet be cut off from opposite sides or that they be exiled from the land.” (TMQ 5:33).

The fighting against these people is not like fighting against rebels who fight against the State. Fighting against the rebels is to discipline them while fighting against the highway robbers is to kill and crucify, so they are fought against when they fight and when they turn back. They are treated as outlined in the verse. Whoever killed and took property, he is killed and crucified; and whoever killed and did not take property, he is killed but not crucified; and whoever took property without killing, his hand and leg will be amputated from opposite sides without killing; and whoever raised arms and scared the people and did not kill or take property, he is only exiled from his area to another place or country far away from the State.

The Department of Internal Security restricts itself to using the police force in maintaining security. It does not use other than the police force except when the police force is unable to maintain internal security. In that case, it requests the Khalifah to provide it with a military force or an army, according to what is required.

With regards to aggression against property by stealing, misappropriation, robbing or looting; or aggression against lives by use of force, wounding or killing; or aggression against honour by lying, slandering, or rape, the Department of Internal Security prevents these things by its vigilance, guards and patrols, and also by implementing the verdicts of the judges against those who perform aggression against the property, lives and honour. All this requires the use of the police force alone.

The police are entrusted with keeping the public order, supervision over the internal security and carrying out all aspects of implementation. This is due to the mentioned narration from Anas who reported that the Messenger (pbuh) used to keep Qays Ibn Sa’d before him like a police chief. This indicates that police are stationed before the rulers, which means they undertake whatever the rulers want of the execution force for implementing the Shari’ah, keeping order and protecting security. This is in addition to conducting patrols, which involves patrolling during the night to pursue thieves and arrest wrongdoers and the wicked. ’Abd Allah b. Mas’ud (ra) was a leader over the night patrols at the time of Abu Bakr (ra). Umar bin Al-Khattab (ra) used to take charge of night patrols by himself, taking his servant in his company and sometimes ’Abd Al-Rahman b. ’Awf (ra). Therefore, it is wrong that some Islamic countries make the owners of the shops appoint guards at night to guard their houses, or appoint guards given by the State at the cost of the owners of the shops. This is because this work is part of the night patrolling which is the duty of the State and of the functions of the police. So, people are not charged with it and nor charged with its costs.

With regards to dealing with the suspicious people who are the people that pose harm and danger to the State entity, to the community or to the individuals; these types of suspects must be pursued by the State. Whoever, from the Ummah has knowledge of any of these must report it. The evidence for this is what Al- Bukhari and Muslim reported from Zayd b Arqam when he said:

 كُنْتُ فِي غَزَاةٍ، فَسَمِعْتُ عَبْدَ اللَّهِ بْنَ أُبَيٍّ ي قَُولُ: لاَ تُ نْفِقُوا عَلَى مَنْ عِنْدَ « رَسُولِ اللَّهِ حَتَّى يَ نْ فَضُّوا مِنْ حَوْلِهِ، وَلَئِنْ رَجَعْنَا مِنْ عِنْدِهِ لَ يُخْرِجَنَّ الأَعَزُّ مِنْ هَا الأَذَلَّ ، »... فَدَعَانِي، فَحَدَّثْ تُهُ ، فَذَكَرْتُ ذَلِكَ لِعَمِّي أَوْ لِعُمَرَ، فَذَكَرَهُ لِلنَّبِيِّ

“While I was taking part in an expedition (Ghaza), I heard `Abdullah bin Ubai (bin Abi Salul) saying: "Don't spend on those who are with Allah's Propher , that they may disperse and go away from him. If we return (to Medina), surely, the more honorable will expel the meaner amongst them." I reported that (saying) to my uncle or to `Umar who, in his turn, informed the Prophet (phuh) of it. The Prophet (phuh) called me and I narrated to him the whole….”. In the narration by Muslim,

 » فأخبرتُه بذلك  فأتيتُ النبيَّ «

“I came to the Prophet (phuh) and informed him of that”. Ibn Ubay was well known for going back and forth to the disbelievers who were at war with the Muslims, and his relations with them such as those with the Jews around Madinah and the enemies of Islam. Here, it is required to closely examine upon the context of this example so as not to mix it with espionage on the citizens, which is prohibited due to His (swt) saying:

“And spy not on each other.” (TMQ 49:12); therefore, spying is only limited to the suspects.

The suspicious people are those who go back and forth to the belligerent disbelievers, either practically or in terms of their ruling (in other words, potentially), and that is because spying is allowed on the belligerent disbelievers as part of the war policy, and for preventing harm from falling upon Muslims. Additionally, the Shari’ah evidences in this subject include all the belligerent people. This is because if they were actual belligerents, then the obligation of spying on them is quite clear. If they were potential belligerents, then spying on them is allowed for war is expected with them at any time.

Thus any citizen that frequently visits the warring disbelievers would be under suspicion due to his contact with those we are permitted to spy on, in other words, the belligerent disbelievers.

The details of this issue will be as follows:

1. Spying on the actual belligerent disbelievers is obliged upon the State; a matter which, besides the above mentioned evidences, is emphasised by the rule:

)ما لا يتم الواجب إلا به فهو واجب(

“that, without which the obligation cannot be accomplished, is itself an obligation.”

This is because the knowledge of the force of the enemy, its plans, its objectives and its strategic locations and the like are necessary to defeat the enemy. This is undertaken by the War Department, and it includes the citizens that make contact with the actual belligerent disbelievers, since in origin there is not usually contact between the citizens and the belligerents, as the relation between them is a relation of war.

2. Spying on the potential belligerent disbelievers is allowed; and it is obligatory upon the State to prevent any harm, such as, when it is feared they would help the actual belligerents or join them. The potential belligerent disbelievers are of two types:

The first: The potential belligerent disbelievers in their country whom the War Department would spy on, and it would be the War Department who was responsible for spying upon them.

The second: The potential belligerent disbelievers that enter our country, such as the ambassadors, the covenants and their like. These have to be put under observation and spying by the Internal Security Department.

The Department of Internal Security takes charge of surveillance and spying on the citizens who frequently visit the officials amongst the potential belligerent disbelievers or their representatives in our country. The War Department also takes charge of the citizens who frequently visit the officials amongst the actual belligerent disbelievers or their representatives in their own country. This however requires two conditions:

The first: There should appear clear evidence through surveillance, carried out by the War Department and Internal Security of the officials amongst the potential belligerent disbelievers or their representatives that the frequent visits to these disbelievers or their representatives, inside or outside the State, are not natural and attract attention.

The second: Whatever is discovered by the two departments has to be presented to the judge of Hisbah; and then the judge of Hisbah rules upon the matter.

If such a case arises then it is allowed for the Department of Internal Security to spy on those citizens that make such frequent visits to the officials amongst the potential belligerent disbelievers or their representatives in our country. It is also permitted for the War Department to spy on the citizens that make frequent visits to the officials amongst the potential belligerent disbelievers and their representatives in their own country. These are the evidences related to all of this:

1. Spying on Muslims is Haram as stipulated in this verse. Allah (swt) says:

“And spy not on each other.” (TMQ 49:12)

This is general prohibition of spying and it has to continue as general unless there is specific evidence. This is confirmed by the narration reported by Ahmad and Abu Dawud with a chain from Al-Miqdad and Abu Umamah when they said:

 » إِنَّ الأَمِيرَ إِذَا ابْ تَ غَى الرِّيبَةَ فِي النَّاسِ أَف سَدَهُمْ «

“The Messenger of Allah (pbuh) said: When a ruler seeks to make imputations against the people, he corrupts them.”. Therefore, spying on a Muslim is prohibited. This rule also applies on the people of the Dhimmah from the citizens of the State. Thus spying is prohibited upon the citizens, Muslims and non-Muslims.

2. Spying on actual belligerent disbelievers, such as those who are at war with us and on the potential belligerent disbelievers, such as those who enter our country with covenant or under our protection like ambassadors and others, or the actual belligerent disbelievers in their own country, is allowed. It is in fact obligatory to spy on the actual belligerent and on the potential belligerent in case of harm.

The evidences are clear in the life of the Messenger of Allah (pbuh) , which are as follows:

• It was reported in the Sirah of Ibn Hisham about the expedition of ’Abd Allah b. Jahsh (ra), where he ordered him to travel for two days without opening the letter he wrote for him. After ’Abd Allah b. Jahsh (ra) travelled for two days he opened the letter of the Messenger of Allah (pbuh) and read it. It read

 إِذَا نَظَرْتَ فِي كِتَابِي هَذَا، فَامْضِ حَتَّى تَ نْزِلَ نَخْلَةً بَ يْنَ مَكَّةَ وَالطَّائِفِ، « » فَ تَ رَصَّدْ بِهَا قُ رَيْشاً، وَتَ عَلَّمْ لَنَا مِنْ أَخْبَارِهِمْ

“If you read this letter of mine, travel till you reach Nakhlah between Makkah and Ta’if where you observe Quraysh movement and collect their news for us.”

It was reported in the Sirah of Ibn Hisham regarding the events of the battle of Badr that Ibn Ishaq said:

 حَتَّى وَقَفَ عَلَ ى شَ يْخٍ مِ نَ العَ ربِ،  هُوَ وَأَبُو بَكْرٍ  رَكِبَ رَسُولُ اللهِ « فَسَ أَلَهُ عَ نْ قُ رَيْشٍ وَعَ نْ مُحَمَّ دٍ وَأَصْ حَابِهِ وَمَ ا بَ لَغَ هُ عَ نْ هُمْ، فَ قَ الَ الشَّ يْخُ: لاَ أُخْبِرُكُمَ ا إِذَا أَخْ بَ رْتَ نَا أَخْبَ رْنَ اكَ. قَ الَ: أَذَاكَ : حَتَّ ى تُخْبِرَانِ ي مِمَّ نْ أَنْ تُمَ ا؟ فَ قَ الَ رَسُ ولُ اللهِ بِذَاكْ ؟ قَالَ: ن عَمْ. قَالَ الشَّيْخُ: ... وَبَ لَغَنِي أَنَّ قُ رَيْش اً خَرَجُ وا يَ وْمَ كَ ذَا وَكَ ذَا، فَ إِنْ كَ انَ الَّ ذِي أَخْ بَ رَنِي صَ دَقَنِي، فَ هُ مُ الْيَ وْمَ بِمَكَ انِ كَ ذَا وَكَ ذَا لِلْمَكَ انِ الَّ ذِي فِي هِ قُ رَيْشٌ، فَ لَمَّ ا نَحْنُ مِ نْ مَ اءٍ، ث مَُّ انْصَ رَفَ عَنْ هُ،  فَرِغَ مِنْ خَبَرِهِ قَالَ: مِمَّنْ أَنْ تُمَا؟ فَ قَالَ رَسُولُ اللهِ إِلَ ى أَصْ حَابِهِ،  قَالَ يَ قُولُ الشَّ يْخُ: مِنْ مَاءٍ، أَمْ مِنْ مَاءِ العِرَاقِ ؟ ثُمَّ رَجَ عَ رَسُ ولُ اللهِ فَ لَمَّا أَمْسَى بَ عَثَ عَلِيَّ بْنَ أَبِي طَالِبٍ وَالزُّبَ يْ رَ بْ نَ العَ وَّامِ وَسَ عْدَ بْ نَ أَبِ ي وَقَّ اصٍ فِ ي نَ فَ رٍ مِنْ أَصْ حَابِهِ، رِضْ وَانُ اللهِ عَلَ يْهِمْ، إِلَ ى مَ اءِ بَ دْرٍ يَ لْتَمِسُ ونَ الْخَبَ رَ عَلَيْ هِ، أَيْ عُ يُوناً عَلَ ى » قُ رَيْشٍ

“The Messenger of Allah (pbuh) and Abu Bakr rode till they met an Arab sheik. He asked him about Quraysh, and Muhammad and his companions, and about anything he might know. The sheikh said: I will not tell you till you tell me from where you are? The Messenger of Allah (pbuh) said, if you tell us, we will tell you. He said, is this for that? He said: yes. The Sheikh said: … I was told that Quraysh had left on such and such day. If one who informed me said the truth, then they would be in such and such place. When the sheikh finished his news, he asked: where are you from? The Messenger of Allah (pbuh) said: from water, and turned away from him. He said: the sheikh was asking: from water or from the water of Iraq? Then the Messenger of Allah (pbuh) returned to his companions. When night fell, he sent ’Ali Ibn Abi Talib, Zubayr Ibn Al-’Awwam and Sa'd Ibn Abi Waqqas together with some of his companions (may Allah be pleased with them) to the Water of Badr to seek the news from there; in other words, to spy upon Quraysh”

• Ibn Ishaq also reported that Ibn Hisham mentioned under the title: “Basbas Ibn Amr and ’Uday Ibn Abu Al-Zaghba' spy for news”, till he said, “’Uday and Basbas heard that (meaning: heard that which the two maids said at the Water regarding the news of Quraysh). So, they jumped onto their two riding camels and went to the Messenger of Allah (pbuh) where they informed him of that which they heard”.

Though these evidences were regarding Quraysh, which was an actual belligerent, the rule applies to the potential belligerent since war is expected with them. The only difference is that spying is obligatory in the case of the actual belligerent because the war policy for defeating the enemy requires that. It is however allowed regarding the potential belligerent because war is expected with them. If there is possible harm from them, in other words, it is expected they might help the belligerent or actually join them, then spying on them becomes obligatory as well.

Thus, spying on the belligerent disbelievers is allowed for Muslims and obligatory upon the State to provide. This is due to the order of the Messenger of Allah (pbuh) to do so as mentioned above. It also comes under the rule:

)ما لا يتم الواجب إلا به فهو واجب(

“that, without which the obligation cannot be accomplished, is itself an obligation”.

If some citizens, whether Muslims or non-Muslims, frequently visited the belligerent disbelievers, whether they were actual or potential belligerents, in our country or in their country, then these are suspects and hence it is allowed to spy on them and follow their news. This is because they frequently visit those whom it is allowed to spy on and because harm is expected from them on the State if they spied for the advantage of the disbelievers.

However, to allow spying on such citizens, the above mentioned two conditions must be verified, and so if those two conditions were not met, then it is prohibited to spy upon the citizens irrespective of whether they were Muslims or from the people of Dhimmah due to the explicit texts regarding that which have been mentioned previously.

The War Department takes charge of spying on the citizens that frequently visit the actual belligerent, as well as on the citizens that frequently visit the officials amongst the potential belligerent and their representatives in their own country. The Department of Internal Security takes charge of spying on the citizens that frequently visit the officials amongst the potential belligerent disbelievers and their representatives in our country.

The police (Shurtah) have two branches: the military police, who are under the command of the Amir of Jihad, in other words, the war department, and the police who are under the control of the Ruler to protect the security, and they are under the authority of the Department of Internal Security. The two branches have specific training and specific culture in order for them to carry out their responsibilities in the best manner.

Police forces are divided into two parts: the military police and the police that work under the command of the Ruler, who must have a special uniform and special signs specific for keeping security.

Al-Azhari said: “Shurtah of any thing is its best. This includes Shurat because they are the best soldiers. It is also said that Shurtah are the first group that come ahead of the Army. It is also mentioned that they are called Shuratan because they have signs that characterise them, in terms of uniform and status”, this is also chosen by Al-Asma’i. It is also mentioned in Al-Qamus: “Shurtah, where the individual is called Shurat, would mean the first battalion that attend the war and is ready for death, it is also the helper of the governors; and they were called so because they announced themselves through signs that characterise them.”

In regards to the military police, which is one of the divisions of the Army that has its sign, it comes ahead of the Army to control its matters, it is a part of the Army and follows the Amir of Jihad; in other words, it follows the war department.

Regarding the police that are put under the service of the rulers, they follow the Department of Internal Security. Al- Bukhari narrated from Anas:

 بِمَنْزِلَةِ صَاحِبِ الشُّ رَطِ  إِنَّ قَ يْسَ بْنَ سَعْدٍ كَانَ يَكُونُ بَ يْنَ يَدَيِ النَّبِيِّ « » مِنَ الأَمِيرِ

“Qais bin Sa`d was to the Prophet (phuh) like a chief police officer to an Amir”. What is meant here is Qays Ibn Sa’d Ibn ’Ubadah Al-Ansari Al-Khazraji. Al-Tirmidhi narrated it with the wording:

 بِمَنْزِلَةِ صَاحِبِ الشُّرَطِ مِنَ الأَمِيرِ، قَالَ  كَانَ قَ يْسُ بْنُ سَعْدٍ مِنَ النَّبِيِّ « » الأَنْصَارِيُّ: يَ عْنِي مِمَّا يَلِي مِنْ أُمُورِه

“Qais bin Sa`d was to the Prophet (phuh) like a chief police officer to an Amir. Al-Ansari said: It means he was one that discharged his issues”.

The Khalifah is allowed to make all the police that are responsible for internal security part of the Army, in other words, that they are placed within the war department, and he is also permitted to make an independent department, in other words, an internal security department.

In this article it is adopted that this section will be independent; in other words, the police that are placed under the service of the rulers to protect their security must follow the Internal Security Department as an independent organisation that answer directly to the Khalifah like other State organisations. This is due to the narration from Anas mentioned previously about Qays Ibn Sa'd, and following the independence of the four departments related to Jihad as mentioned before. Each one of them would follow the Khalifah, rather than to be left all together as one organisation. Thus the Shurtah would follow the Department of Internal Security.

Page 9 of 14

Superior Economic Model : Islamic System