In our world today there is gross extremism in terms of wealth distribution, whether nationally or globally. In Britain 90% of the wealth is owned by about 5% of the population. Globally, though most of the world’s reserves are in the so-called ‘Third World’, these regions are the most poverty stricken. In one corner of the globe children die of hunger, whereas in another butter mountains and milk lakes are formed due to excess food production. It is in the face of such gross imbalances that we are asked to make heart-wrenching decisions about health services and food aid.

In one corner of the globe luxuries of life are in abundance, and in another even the basic needs for survival are absent.

Islam stands alone in the world of today in its vision of the economic problem, striking at the root of this terrible scenario. Unlike Capitalism and Communism it does not preoccupy itself with means of production. Rather it ensures distribution by not only limiting the type of wealth that can be acquired, but also the means by which it is acquired.

So in Islam natural utilities like gas and oil cannot be owned privately, as we see in a world today where multinational companies stake their rights on the wealth of Muslim Ummah. The Prophet (saw) said, “The human beings are partners in three things water, green pastures and fire.”.

In Islam such wealth would be distributed to ensure that society’s needs can be met, enabling the Khilafah to provide for its citizens services that would seem unimaginable to us in today’s world.

Under Islam each house will be allocated a quota of fuel more than adequate for its needs. Imagine, no electricity or gas bills, let alone water rates. In terms of health care the potential too is incredible. Today we provide guide dogs for the blind. During the time of ‘Umar ibn Abdul- Aziz two men were employed by the State to care for each blind person. Public transport is also regarded as a State service, so this would also be free.

Islam also prevents other unfair means of acquiring wealth, thereby ensuring distribution. Islam forbids the giving and taking of interest. Consequently banks would not be able to extract interest from those who are needy of loans. Today we find a situation where those who are able to pay off their mortgage sometimes find themselves paying more than twice the value of the house. Furthermore many fail and have their houses repossessed. On a global scale the ‘Third World’ is unable to pay the interest on loans from the World Bank and the IMF, and their ability to feed their populations is ‘repossessed.’.

Indeed in Islam the whole concept of banking is different. Banks are not companies but are services. So any profits are re-invested for the benefit of the citizens. There is no incentive for banks to exploit other individuals or nations in the way the banks of today do. So once again we may see a time when Africa is able to support other countries as it did during the Khilafah.

Just as banks would not be able to exploit the masses nor can the government do so in the manner it does today. For in Islam there is no income tax, Value Added Tax or road tax etc. These are all indiscriminate with regards to whether people are capable of paying them or not. In the Khilafah, only those who can afford to pay taxes are subject to them.