The intellectual struggle between Islam and the remaining kufr civilisations is a factual reality; and it is obligatory upon Muslims, even when the kuffar did not initiate the struggle against them. The Messenger of Allah
initiated it in Makkah before the State and after the secret stage. The situation remained thus until our time and it will remain until when Allah wills. It is quite apparent even if it is obscured to some people. Whoever studied the books of 'Creeds and Sects' (Al-Millal wan- Nihal) will find intellectual struggle therein with all the thoughts that Muslims knew.

This struggle between the Western civilisation and Islamic civilisation is manifested in many styles including:

1. Dominance over the media apparatus and directing them for the benefit of the Capitalist civilisation.

2. Dominance over the education syllabi at all its levels in order to spread the Western concepts, distort and fight some of the concepts of Islamic civilisation and forge the history of Muslims.

3. Establishing schools and universities directly supervised by Westerners.

4. Setting up parties that adopt Western civilisation and call for it, and which are protected by the West and its moderate progressive friends.

5. Sponsoring those whom they call the elite, educated and intellectuals, focusing light upon them and promoting them, so that they become the leaders of thought in the countries of the Islamic world.

6. Funding the educational scholarships and courses in their various types, to choose those suitable to become their intellectual or political agents, or agents i.e. spies.

7. Founding institutions, clubs and centres specialised in spreading their poison, and spending generously upon them.

8. Fighting the Arabic language and reviving non-Arabic languages,

and inciting nationalistic and patriotic agitations.

Even what is called struggle for interests (sira'a ul-masalih) is originally founded upon intellectual differences, and then it is followed by intellectual struggle. This struggle over interests could reach military conflict. The weak one who is not able to engage in military conflict does not embark on a struggle for interests, except as much as the hyena or fox can do to the lion's prey. This struggle for interests could be between two different civilisations, just as it is possible to be between two countries or peoples of one civilisation. When America invaded the Gulf, occupied it and extended its influence upon it, settled, established (itself) and gained ground, its goal definitely was not the liberation of Kuwait; rather it was a struggle over the petrol interests and spreading the influence. As one of them said: "We came to correct the mistake of the Lord" i.e. in His subhanahu wa ta'ala creating petrol in the Gulf instead of the West. And Schultz said in a television programme on 16/12/90: "It is necessary to demolish Iraq militarily, even if it withdrew from Kuwait." And Dick Cheney said before Congress on 3/12/90: "It is necessary to guarantee that this type of invasion is not repeated irrespective of the manner of settling this, and even if Saddam withdrew from Kuwait." It is known that Iraq, Kuwait and the rest of the Gulf were until that time a region of British influence, so America was struggling with Britain politically and economically, even though both of them belong to one civilisation namely Capitalism. At the same time, it was struggling with Muslims politically, economically and militarily, and it adopts Capitalism and struggles with Muslims who abandoned their Islamic civilisation or most of its concepts. America's struggle with Muslims in the previous styles is built upon a civilisational concept for them, namely colonizing weaker nations and allowing the domination of their capabilities. Look at it is now repeating the attack in Central Asia. Likewise its struggle with Britain is built upon a civilisation concept different to that upon which its struggle with Arabs is built. It struggles with Britain in the Gulf because it must be alone in its leadership of the New World, and in plundering the resources of the weak. America, as Bush says, must be the vanguard so there is no scope for two poles in the world leadership; rather it is only one leader, which must be America, the heir of ancient colonialism, without rival. Among examples of the struggle between two civilisations is the Capitalist America and the communist Soviet Union. It however, did not reach the point of military conflict, and was restricted to the political, intellectual and economic struggle that ended with the collapse of the Soviet Union. Of the examples of struggle between the sons of one civilisation is the struggle between the Nazis and others among the Capitalists; it was a struggle between those who view the superiority of the German race over other races and those who deny racial distinction between the races of the European and American peoples that adopt Capitalism. However, the struggle remained within the domain of one civilisation. It was based upon a specific concept which was a part of the Nazis' civilisation opposite to the concept of the Allies.

The intellectual struggle is the basis for every struggle on the face of the earth from the difference of the two sons of Adam until our time; and it will continue until when Allah (SWTH) wills. Accordingly, we began with the intellectual struggle.