Shar’a prohibited usury absolutely, regardless of its percentage, whether it was high or low. The usury gain is definitely Haram; nobody has the right to own it, and it has to be returned to its original owners if they were known. Allah (swt) said:

“Those who devour (take) interest (riba) cannot stand except as the one whom the Satan, by (his) touch, drives Him to madness. That is because they say: Trade is just like riba, whereas Allah permitted trade and forbade riba. The one to whom an admonition from his Lord comes and He refrains (in obedience thereto), He shall keep (the profits of) that which is past, and his affair (henceforth) is with Allah. As for Him who returns (to usury), such are rightful owners of the fire. They will abide therein eternally.” [Al-Baqarah: 275] And He (swt) said:

“O you who believe! Observe your duty to Allah, and give up what remains of your demands for usury, if you are (in truth) believers. And if you do not, then take notice of war (against you) from Allah and His Messenger. And if you repent then you have your capital (without interest). Deal not unjustly, nor be dealt with unjustly.” [Al-Baqarah: 278-279].

The true reality of usury is that the interest which the usurer takes is an exploitation of the effort of the people, and it is a recompense without spending any effort; and because the money on which usury is taken is of secured interest, not subject to any loss, is a matter which disagrees with the general rule which states: ‘Loss goes with the gain.’ Therefore, investing the property by partnership, Mudharaba and sharecropping within their conditions is allowed as the community benefits from them and the effort of other people is not exploited, but they are rather a means which enables them to benefit from their own effort, and this investment is subject to loss as it is subject to profit, a matter which is different than usury. However, prohibiting the usury was by the text, which was not reasoned, and the Ahadith of the Messenger of Allah (pbuh) explained the commodities in which usury (increase or decrease) is prohibited. Anyhow, it may occur to the mind that the person who possesses a property will keep it for himself, and He may not be generous enough to lend it to the needy in order to meet their needs. Such need will press on the needy person, so there should be a means to meet such need. Moreover, the needs, nowadays, have become numerous and varied, and usury became the foundation of trading, agriculture and industry. Therefore, banks were established to deal with usury, and there is no way other than them as there is no way other than usurers to meet the needs.

The answer to this is that we talk about the society in which the whole of Islam including the economic aspects, is applied, not about the society in its current situation. This is because the current society is run according to the Capitalist system; therefore, the bank emerged in it as one of life’s necessities. So the owner of the property who sees himself free in his ownership, and who sees himself free to exploit by cheating, monopoly, gambling, usury and such like, without supervision from a government or restriction by a law no doubt, considers usury and the bank to be of life’s necessities.

The current economic system has to be changed completely and to be replaced, radically and completely, by the Islamic system of economics. If this system was removed and the Islamic system was applied, then it will appear to the people that in the society in which Islam is applied, usury does not appear to be necessary, because the one who needs to borrow, needs that for either living or farming. In regard to the first need, Islam meets it by securing the livelihood for every citizen. As for the second need, Islam meets that by lending to the needy without usury. Ibn Hibban narrated from Ibn Mas’oud that He said that the Messenger of Allah (pbuh) said: “Any Muslim who lends (to) another Muslim twice, surely it would be counted as one charity.” Lending to the needy is recommended and borrowing is not disliked, it is rather recommended because the Messenger of Allah (pbuh) used to borrow. And since borrowing exists, and it is recommended for the borrower and the lender, then it became apparent that usury is one of the most severe harms to economic life. It rather became obvious that it is necessary to eliminate usury and to establish thick barriers between it and the society by legislation and direction in accordance with the system of Islam.

If usury was eliminated then there would be no need for the banks, which exist today. The Bait ul-Mal (treasury fund) will remain the only lender of property without interest after ascertaining the possibility of benefiting from the property. ’Umar ibn al Khattab gave the farmers in Iraq properties from the Bait ul-Mal to (help them) use their land’. The divine law (Hukm Shar’i) states that the farmers are given from the Bait ul- Mal properties which help them to use their land, until the crops are collected. Imam Abu Yusuf said: ‘The needy is given a property as a loan from the Bait ul-Mal which He needs in order to work in his land.’ As the Bait ul-Mal lends to farmers for agriculture, it lends to others like the craftsmen who carry out individual work or things they may need to maintain themselves. ’Umar gave to the farmers because they were in need to meet their own livelihood; so the rich farmers would not be given anything from the Bait ul-Mal to increase their production. By analogy with farmers, any other people similar to them in need for meeting their own livelihood are provided for. The Messenger of Allah (pbuh) gave a man a rope and an axe to cut wood for gaining his food. However, avoiding usury is not subject to the existence of the Islamic society, or the existence of the Islamic State, or the existence of the one who lends the property, rather usury is Haram and it must be avoided whether there is an Islamic State or not, and whether there is an Islamic society or not, or there are those who lend property or not.