Refutation of the Capitalist Western Thought by Hizb Ut Tahrir

The economic problem according to the West can be simply summarized as the axiomatic principle of relative scarcity, with limited resources amidst unlimited needs. It means an insufficiency of goods and services to satiate all human needs completely. This is why they say, “The problem is that, although your wants, or desires, are virtually unlimited, the resources available to satisfy these wants are scarce,” as stated in Economics: A Contemporary Introduction by William A. McEachern. Thus the Western intellect sees that “human needs are unlimited and man always seeks for more and better...one can never be fully satiated," as stated in the book Introduction to Economics by Jelle Zijlstra. Since needs and desires are unlimited, whilst the material to satiate them are limited, the economic problem, according to the Westerners, emerges from the inability of achieving the complete satiation of such needs.

This view of the West is erroneous and contradictory to the sensed reality. This is because needs that must be satiated mandatorily are only the basic needs of a person, by virtue of being a human. These are not the secondary needs or the needs for luxuries, although Man seeks and works for the satiation of the needs for luxuries. Accordingly, the basic needs such as food, clothing and shelter are limited. The wealth and efforts, which they call goods and services, are sufficiently available to satiate the primary, basic needs all over the world. As for the problem of ever increasing needs, it is not related to the increase in basic needs, because the basic needs of a man, by virtue of being a human, do not increase. What increases continuously are the luxuries that arise from material progress. Man strives to satiate the needs for such luxuries, however, the non-satiation of such needs does not create problems. Instead, what causes problems is the non-satiation of basic needs alone.

Accordingly, there is no problem in the limitation of goods and services to satiate basic needs, so as to define it as an economic problem for society to address. The economic problem is in fact the distribution of such wealth and efforts. It is the distribution of wealth and efforts to all individuals that allows them to satiate all the basic needs completely, whilst helping them strive for the satiation of their needs for luxuries.

In the United States, for instance, thousands of tonnes of grains are dumped into the sea, without being distributed to the millions of poor in the country. The United States hoards billions of dollars, which is neither utilized in the wheels of the economy nor given to the poor. Thus the issue is neither the scarcity of material nor the unlimitedness of needs. It is only the view of the capitalist economy which is built on monopoly, greed, envy and selfishness. It is the capitalist economy that put eighty percent of the nation’s wealth into the hands of select bands of capitalists. It is the capitalists who transform society into consumer societies, in order to market their products, to maximize profits under the pretext that the increased consumption by individuals or groups results in a higher level of well-being in the society.

The capitalist economy has neglected the issue of the distribution of wealth. Instead, the capitalist economy made its economic goals centered on achieving materialistic development, whilst treating unemployment, inflation and deflation. Thus the capitalist economy aims at achieving one goal, which is to increase the collective wealth of a nation. It works to reach the highest possible production level, in the pursuit of the maximum well-being for the members of society, as a result of increasing income and raising the production level of the nation. This goal is achieved by enabling them to obtain wealth, whilst leaving individuals the freedom to work to secure production and distribution.

Thus the capitalist economy does not find treatments to satiate the needs of individuals and to provide the satiation for every individual of the society. Instead, it only focuses on providing things that satiate the needs of individuals. So it focusses on the collective needs of increasing the production and income, providing the opportunity to work, whilst leaving this freedom to the individuals. This is regardless of whether satiation of basic needs is achieved for all individuals, or it is only achieved by some of the individuals, and not others. This is neither the field of economic research, nor is its goal to satiate all the individuals. In their view, the poor must bear the responsibility for their poverty, because they themselves are the cause for it. This view of the capitalists is erroneous and contradicts reality because the basic needs that must be satiated are individual needs, by virtue of being human. These are the needs of Ali and Anthony and not the needs of select groups of people or nations.

Accordingly, the origin of economic policy must be to ensure the satiation of all the basic needs of all the individuals, with complete satiation, whilst enabling them to satiate the luxurious needs as much as they can. It is erroneous to increase the production, economic development and raise the living standards of the nation as a whole, without ensuring that everyone benefits. It is also erroneous to offer welfare to people, leaving them free to take welfare as much as they can, without guaranteeing the right to living for every one of them, no matter who he is. Thus the Western economic policy, that aims to develop the economy and increase production, neglects the distribution. The Western economic policy is concerned only with the search for producing the materialistic economy, without concern for the right of every individual of the society, in satiating their basic needs. It is an erroneous policy that theoretically provides relative well-being to a group of individuals, whilst pronouncing guilt upon the rest of people afflicted by poverty and destitution. This is even though they are equal in their rights to a living and satiation of the basic needs.

As for Islam, in addition to Shariah rulings to legislate ownership and work to increase production, it has legislated other rulings to ensure the complete satiation of all the basic needs of all the individuals. Islam also ensures the distribution of wealth for each individual citizen, one by one. Islam ensures all the basic needs such as food, clothing and shelter, are distributed to ensure complete, universal satiation. Additionally, Islam enables each individual citizen to satiate the needs for luxuries as much as possible. Thus Islam neither ensures the satiation of basic needs as a patchwork to the system, nor addresses specific vulnerabilities, singling out certain groups to the exclusion of others, as Capitalism does. Instead Islam made modes of distribution as rulings of the system itself. Thus the rulings of permitting the ownership and work for it, rulings of spending, rulings of taking care of all the affairs, all these are Shariah rulings, of equal import in legislation and evidence. Islam gives rise to a complete economic system as we have detailed in our books.