Fall Of Capitalism and Rise of Islam by Mohammad Malkawi

It is true that a practical model of the Islamic ideology does not fully exist in the contemporary world. However, Islam is not a new religion or ideology. On the contrary, Islam has the longest record of implementation for any single ideology. Socialism has less than eighty years of experience in its record. Capitalism, in any of its forms or shapes, barely has two hundred years of practical implementation in its record. Islam, on the other hand, had more than thirteen hundred years of implementation. During this period, it experienced strength and weakness, victory and defeat, progress and decline. In other words, the duration of the Islamic ideology in practical life has sufficient data to validate the ability of Islam to cope with various aspects of life, to deal with crisis, to resolve human-related problems, to organize the life of humans, to administer warfare relations, and to manage peaceful interrelations.

Throughout the implementation period of Islam, several nations came under the rule of Islam with diverse languages, ethnicity, religions, colors, and races. So the record of implementation of Islam is far more rich than required to test any ideology. This section will provide a brief account of the history of the Islamic ideology in action. For more detailed information on the history of the Islamic state and civilization, the reader can consult a wide spectrum of publication on the Islamic history.176

To illustrate the success of the Islamic ideology in achieving its objectives in creating a stable and just system, I will rely on historical witnesses of scholars and historians. I will resort to the witnesses of non-Muslim historians and scholars to add more reliability to the discussion and conclusions.

Quite few historians devoted part of their account to the personality of Mohammad the Prophet as a creator of a civilization based on the ideology and religion of Islam. The personality of the leader and his ability to mold a society based on his ideas and beliefs demonstrates the practicality of the ideology. Edward Gibbon in The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire177 writes about Prophet Mohammad and says, “The good sense of Mohammad despised the pomp of royalty. The Apostle of God submitted to the menial offices of the family; he kindled the fire; swept the floor; milked the ewes; and mended with his own hands his shoes and garments. Disdaining the penance and merit of a hermit, he observed without effort of vanity the abstemious diet of an Arab.” Edward Gibbon and Simon Oakley, in another account, extend the observation from the unique stewardship traits of Mohammad to his followers and their ability to sustain a civilization for more than twelve hundred years.178 The moral force of Mohammad the Prophet is cited as a major contributor to the success of the civilization he created. Gibbon and Oakley write with great esteem and admiration, “It is not the propagation but the permanency of his religion that deserves our wonder, the same pure and perfect impression which he engraved at Mecca and Medina is preserved after the revolutions of twelve centuries by the Indian, the African and the Turkish proselytes of the Quran.” The consistency of the theoretical foundation of the ideology with the practical implementation is noticed by Gibbon and Oakley in their writings. “The Muslims have uniformly withstood the temptation of reducing the object of their faith and devotion to a level with the senses and imagination of man.” With great elegance, the historians maintained that the simplicity of the creed of Islam (I believe in One God and Mohammad the Apostle of God) had a great impact on the successful implementation of the simple and invariable ideology of Islam. “The intellectual image of the Deity has never been degraded by any visible idol; the honors of the Prophet have never transgressed the measure of human virtue, and his living precepts have restrained the gratitude of his disciples within the bounds of reason and religion.”179

In 1878, Reverend Bosworth Smith,180 after a thorough investigation of the history of Islam and the man behind the successful implementation of Islam, described Mohammad as “head of the State as well as the Church (or religion)” in a reference to the integration of the state functions within Islam. According to Rev. Smith, Mohammad was Caesar and pope in one; but he was pope without the pope’s pretensions, and Caesar without the legions of Caesar, without a standing army, without a bodyguard, without a police force, without fixed revenue. Rev. Smith concludes his finding with the following testimony: “If ever a man ruled by a right divine, it was Mohammad, for he had all the powers without their supports. He cared not for the dressings of power. The simplicity of his private life was in keeping with his public life.” In other words, the comprehensive ideology of Islam was backed by a strong and intelligent leadership, which created a story of success. In the Reverend’s words, “after his mission had been proclaimed, we have a book (Quran) absolutely unique in its origin, in its preservation, on the Substantial authority of which no one has ever been able to cast a serious doubt.” Another investigation of the history of the implementation of Islam was conducted by Arthur Stanley Tritton.181 He examined the claim made by some historians that Islam was spread by the sword, and that Muslims forced other nations into Islam after the conquest of their lands. In 1951, A. S. Tritton wrote, “The picture of the Muslim soldier advancing with a sword in one hand and the Qur’an in the other is quite false.”182 The same conclusion was made by De Lacy O’Leary183 in his publication Islam at the Crossroads184 where he wrote, “History makes it clear, however, that the legend of fanatical Muslims sweeping through the world and forcing Islam at the point of sword upon conquered races is one of the most fantastically absurd myths that historians have ever repeated.” This conclusion was also made by James Michener,185 where he says, “No other religion in history spread so rapidly as Islam. The West has widely believed that this surge of religion was made possible by the sword. But no modern scholar accepts this idea, and the Quran is explicit in the support of the freedom of conscience.” Lawrence E. Browne186 also dismisses the myth surrounding the spread of Islam by force and makes the following remarks: “Well-established facts dispose of the idea so widely fostered in Christian writings that the Muslims, wherever they went, forced people to accept Islam at the point of the sword.” The claim that Islam used the sword to spread the religion has no evidence whatsoever as asserted by several historians. Historian K. S. Ramakrishna Rao, in Mohammed: The Prophet of Islam (1989), says that this claim is a distortion of history and it is not even worth the investigation. He confirms the conclusions of other historians about the incorrectness of the claim that Islam had spread by the power of the sword.

Perhaps, one of the most thorough accounts of the history of Islam in terms of the ideological foundation, the Prophet of Islam (Mohammad PBUH), and the Islamic civilization was provided by Alphonse de Lamartine.187 In his famous article “Historie de la Turquie,”188 Lamartine made the following conclusion about Prophet Mohammad (PBUH): “Never has a man set for himself, voluntarily or involuntarily, a more sublime aim, since this aim was superhuman; to subvert superstitions which had been imposed between man and his Creator, to render God unto man and man unto God.” Lamartine admired the ability of Mohammad to “restore the rational and sacred idea of divinity amidst the chaos of the material and disfigured gods of idolatry.” On coupling both theory and practice, Lamartine wrote, “Never has a man undertaken a work so far beyond human power with so feeble means, for he (Mohammad) had in the conception as well as in the execution of such a great design, no other instrument than himself and no other aid except a handful of men living in a corner of the desert.” Translating a theoretical foundation and ideology into a revolution and constructing a long-lasting civilization was noted by the French historian with great appreciation: “Never has a man accomplished such a huge and lasting revolution in the world, because in less than two centuries after its appearance, Islam, in faith and in arms, reigned over the whole of Arabia, and conquered, in God’s name, Persia, Khorasan, Transoxania, Western India, Syria, Egypt, Abyssinia, all the known continent of Northern Africa, numerous islands of the Mediterranean Sea, Spain, and part of Gaul.” Concluding his remarks, and drawing analogy with contemporary systems and ideologies, Lamartine decidedly bestows the title of greatness upon Mohammad, not only for the solid and sound theory he proclaimed, but also for the system he built upon that foundation. His remarks are summarized as follows: “If greatness of purpose, smallness of means, and astonishing results are the three criteria of a human genius, who could dare compare any great man in history with Mohammad? The most famous men created arms, laws, and empires only. They founded, if anything at all, no more than material powers which often crumbled away before their eyes. This man moved not only armies, legislations, empires, peoples, dynasties, but millions of men in one-third of the then inhabited world; and more than that, he moved the altars, the gods, the religions, the ideas, the beliefs and the souls.” The power of Islam and its ability to mold nations and create unity among people by the virtue of its own ideas is further explained by Lamartine, where he says, “On the basis of a Book, every letter which has become law, he created a spiritual nationality which blends together peoples of every tongue and race. He has left the indelible characteristic of this Muslim nationality the hatred of false gods and the passion for the One and Immaterial God. This avenging patriotism against the profanation of Heaven formed the virtue of the followers of Mohammad; the conquest of one-third the earth to the dogma was his miracle; or rather it was not the miracle of man but that of reason.”.

Lamartine commented on the power of the Islamic creed of the unity of God, and purported that it was in itself such a miracle that upon its utterance from his lips, it destroyed all the ancient temples of idols. This dogma was twofold the unity of God and the immateriality of God: the former telling what God is, the latter telling what God is not; the one overthrowing false gods with the sword, the other starting an idea with words.

Mahatma Gandhi,189 the great Indian reformer, gave his interpretation of the Islamic civilization and ideological foundation under the leadership of Prophet Mohammad (PBUH), asserting that the spread of Islam was due to the power of ideas rather than the power of sword. Gandhi sums up his findings in these words: “I wanted to know the best of the life of one (Mohammad) who holds today an undisputed sway over the hearts of millions of mankind. I became more than ever convinced that it was not the sword that won a place for Islam in those days in the scheme of life. It was the rigid simplicity, the utter self-effacement of the Prophet the scrupulous regard for pledges, his intense devotion to his friends and followers, his intrepidity, his fearlessness, his absolute trust in God and in his own mission. These and not the sword carried everything before them and surmounted every obstacle. When I closed the second volume (of the Prophet’s biography), I was sorry there was not more for me to read of that great life.” The Irish Noble Prize winner Sir George Bernard Shaw190 makes the following remarks on the ability of Islam to deliver its declared objectives of justice and fairness: “If any religion had the chance of ruling over England, nay Europe within the next hundred years, it could be Islam.” Bernard Shaw further explains, “I have always held the religion of Mohammad in high estimation because of its wonderful vitality. It is the only religion which appears to me to possess that assimilating capacity to the changing phase of existence which can make itself appeal to every age. I have studied him—the wonderful man and in my opinion far from being an anti-Christ, he must be called the Savior of Humanity.” His study of Islam in action and the Islamic ideology in practice led Shaw to express his feelings about the ability of Islam to deliver a system capable of addressing the needs of humans at any time and at any place; he says, “I believe that if a man like him were to assume the dictatorship of the modern world he would succeed in solving its problems in a way that would bring it the much needed peace and happiness: I have prophesied about the faith of Mohammad that it would be acceptable to the Europe of tomorrow as it is beginning to be acceptable to the Europe of today.”.

Michael Hart191 placed Prophet Mohammad on the top of the first one hundred most influential people in the history of mankind. Hart justified his decision to pick Mohammad to top the list of the greatest people by giving the following account: “He was the only man in history who was supremely successful on both the secular and religious level. It is probable that the relative influence of Mohammad on Islam has been larger than the combined influence of Jesus Christ and St. Paul on Christianity. It is this unparalleled combination of secular and religious influence which I feel entitles Mohammad to be considered the most influential single figure in human history.” Similar to Michael Hart, Dr. William Draper192 asserts that Prophet Mohammad has exercised the greatest influence upon the human race. In the preface to his translation of the Holy Quran, John Rodwell193 made similar observations on Prophet Mohammad’s career as a wonderful instance of the force and life that resides in him who possesses an intense faith in God and in the unseen world. Rodwell asserts that “he (Mohammad) will always be regarded as one of those who have had that influence over the faith, morals and whole earthly life of their fellow men, which none but a really great man ever did, or can exercise; and whose efforts to propagate a great verity will prosper.” Commenting on the common view held by Western people about the life of Mohammad and his ability to lead a nation into prosperity, stability, and global outreach, W. Montgomery Watt194 admires Mohammad’s integrity which is manifested through his readiness to undergo persecution for his beliefs and through the high moral character of the men who believed in him and looked up to him as a leader, and the greatness of his ultimate achievement. Further to these remarks, Montgomery believes that embedded in the Quran and other expressions of the Islamic vision are vast stores of divine truth from which he and other occidentals have still much to learn. In his views, Islam is a strong contender for the supplying the basic framework of the one religion of the future.

One of the greatest contributions and achievements of Islam was its ability to transform nomad Arab tribes into a civilized society with global reach. Before Islam, the Arabs were mostly scattered tribes across the desert that did not leave any significant trace of civilization. The Islamic transformation of the Arabs into a new global entity with a well-defined mission and a civilized method was recognized by British historian Arthur Glyn Leonard in Islam, Her Moral and Spiritual Values. He observes, “It was the genius of Muhammad, the spirit that he breathed into the Arabs through the soul of Islam that exalted them. That raised them out of the lethargy and low level of tribal stagnation up to the high watermark of national unity and empire. It was in the sublimity of Muhammad’s deism, the simplicity, the sobriety and purity it inculcated the fidelity of its founder to his own tenets, that acted on their moral and intellectual fiber with all the magnetism of true inspiration.” The ideological transformation of Arabs into a nation with an outstanding character, which surpassed many of the existing ones at the time, was also recognized by professor emeritus of Semitic literature at Princeton University Philip K. Hitti195 in is book History of the Arabs: From the Earliest Times to Present. According to Hitti, “Within a brief span of mortal life, Mohammad called forth of unpromising material, a nation, never welded before; in a country that was hitherto but a geographical expression he established a religion which in vast areas suppressed Christianity and Judaism, and laid the basis of an empire that was soon to embrace within its far flung boundaries the fairest provinces the then civilized world.” One of the main reasons for the successful implementation of the Islamic ideology is the strict separation of the personal selfish motives from the overall objectives of the mission of Islam. This was observed by American historian Washington Irving196 in his article “Mahomet and His Successors.” Irving sums up the integrity and ideological character of Prophet Mohammad in these words: “In his private dealings he was just. He treated friends and strangers, the rich and poor, the powerful and weak, with equity, and was beloved by the common people for the affability with which he received them, and listened to their complaints.” This unique character granted Islam a powerful momentum which lasted for centuries ahead. Irving continues saying, “His military triumphs awakened neither pride nor vain glory, as they would have done had they been affected for selfish purposes. In the time of his greatest power he maintained the same simplicity of manners and appearance as in the days of his adversity. So far from affecting a regal state, he was displeased if, on entering a room, any unusual testimonials of respect were shown to him. If he aimed at a universal dominion, it was the dominion of faith; as to the temporal rule which grew up in his hands, as he used it without ostentation, so he took no step to perpetuate it in his family.” One of the greatest achievements of Islam throughout its implementation history was its ability to melt multiple nations and races into one Islamic nation (Ummah) with bonds of brotherhood and faith. Canon Taylor,197 in a paper read before the Church Congress at Wolverhampton in 1887, makes the following observation: “Islam gives hope to the slave, brotherhood to mankind, and recognition of the fundamental facts of human nature.” This fact was also recognized by historian R. L. Mellema, who notes that the doctrine of brotherhood of Islam extends to all human beings, no matter what color, race, or creed. He further contends that Islam is the only religion which has been able to realize this doctrine in practice. Indeed, Muslims, wherever on the world they are, will recognize each other as brothers, even when Islam as an ideology is not at the ruling level.

The British historian H. A. R. Gibb198 observes that Islam possesses a magnificent tradition of interracial understanding and cooperation, in a manner that no other society has such a record of success uniting in an equality of status, of opportunity, and of endeavors so many and so various races of mankind. Note that this power stems from the foundation of Islam, which, if utilized, still has the capacity to reconcile apparently irreconcilable elements of race and tradition faced by the world community today. The extinction of race consciousness as between Muslims is one of the outstanding achievements of Islam. In the contemporary world, which is ravaged by racial divides, there is a crying need for the propagation of this Islamic virtue. This virtue of Islam gained the appreciation of prominent historians, including Arnold Toynbee,199 who analyzed with great scrutiny world civilizations.

Contrary to the myth propagated in the mass media that terrorism is rooted within Islam, the history of the Islamic civilization during the periods of Islamic rule points to the other direction. The British historian Wells (1866-1946)200 appreciated the fact that the Islamic teachings integrate great traditions for equitable and gentle dealings and behavior. According to Wells, the Islamic doctrine inspires people with nobility and tolerance. Wells further admires the highest order values advanced by Islam and at the same time practicable. He also notes that Islam brought into existence a society in which hard-heartedness and collective oppression and injustice were the least as compared with all other societies. The British historian concludes with this testimony, “Islam is replete with gentleness, courtesy, and fraternity.” The Indian politician and activist Sarojini Naidu201 also appreciated the justice inherent within the message of Islam. She contemplated that the sense of justice is one of the most wonderful ideals of Islam. She wrote, “As I read in the Qur’an I find those dynamic principles of life, not mystic but practical ethics for the daily conduct of life suited to the whole world.”202

The other area of contention is the way Muslims and Islam deal with non-Muslims. The fear that Islam and Muslims may subjugate non-Muslims to hardships and deny them their basic rights as citizens is not founded. On the contrary, the Islamic civilization throughout its prevailing period is a great testimony to the fairness of Islam towards non-Muslims. Addison James Thayer studied the relations between Muslims and non-Muslims and concludes that even after the crusade wars, Muslim rulers seldom made their Christian subjects suffer for the Crusades.203 He writes, “When the Muslims resumed full control of Palestine, the Christians were given a good status and experienced enlightened justice.” Addison James also notes that under the Crusaders, Christians were forbidden access to the shrines, and not until the Muslim victories could they enjoy their rights as Christians.

The level of advancement achieved by the Islamic ideology throughout its implementation is widely recognized by scholars and historians. UCLA professor of sociology and physiology Jared Diamond204 remarkably summarized how Islam excelled at the time when Europe lagged behind. He writes, “Medieval Islam was technologically advanced and open to innovation. It achieved far higher literacy rates than in contemporary Europe; it assimilated the legacy of classical Greek civilization to such a degree that many classical books are now known to us only through Arabic copies. It invented windmills, trigonometry, lateen sails and made major advances in metallurgy, mechanical and chemical engineering and irrigation methods. In the middle-ages the flow of technology was overwhelmingly from Islam to Europe rather from Europe to Islam. Only after the 1500’s did the net direction of flow begin to reverse.”.

The testimonials facts on the Islamic civilization in terms of tolerance, brotherhood, justice, fairness, prosperity, advancement, and human rights are abundant. The idea here is not to provide a lesson of history. Rather, it is to quell the fear that has swamped the hearts of many due to links between Islam and terrorism, or Islam and unfair treatment of people, or Islam and backwardness. The observations made by historians, politicians, scholars, and writers all indicate that Islam and its civilization is far from any of these negative connotations.